Friday, January 3, 2014

Murakami/Rabinowitz/TheFall


Today I read the next fifty pages of Hard-Boiled Wonderland. In this section, the Calcutec and the Professor’s granddaughter finally succeed in finding the Professor, who has retreated to his refuge in order to avoid being kidnapped by either the Semiotecs or by the System, his former employers. The Professor explains to the Calcutec in great detail exactly what he’s done to the Calcutec’s brain, and why. We receive confirmation not only that the Town is located in the Calcutec’s head, but also that ‘the end of the world’ refers not to an apocalypse in the conventional sense, but rather to the imminent shutdown of the Calcutec’s core consciousness, a process that the Professor seems powerless to stop. This information changes the reader’s views not only of the Hard-Boiled Wonderland, but also of the town named the End of the World, which now takes on an even more frankly fabulistic character. My favorite aspect of the novel so far is the relative equanimity with which the Calcutec greets the news of his approaching lack of consciousness. I also love the way in which the apocalyptic overtones of this part of the narrative turn out to be both personal and mental rather than planetary; perhaps this is the way, after all, that any one of us would experience true apocalypse!

I also read the next fifty pages of Paula Rabinowitz’s Black & White & Noir: America’s Pulp Modernism. This section of the book is titled ‘White: Work and Memory’ and in it Rabinowitz turns her attention from African American culture to the noir-ish elements of white culture during the 1930s and 1940s. In a chapter on ‘Rural Pulp and Documentary Modernism,’ for example, Rabinowitz looks at the ways in which the impulses that shaped the documentary photography of the period can also be found in pop culture, including film noir. Even though this photography typically showed the heartland rather than the cities one associates with noir, Rabinowitz argues that one prepared the way for the other: “Documentary rhetoric in the 1930s reworked the form into a vehicle for creating a national popular culture, securing the city, or letting it languish, as grist for pulp fiction, a space apart from the location of political truth, until Hollywood returned to the city in the postwar years with film noir.” This argument is typical of the way Rabinowitz uses the reader’s assumed familiarity with the conventions of film noir to make arguments about less familiar materials.

I also watched the final episode of The Fall. The series left itself with a lot of work to do in this final episode and it definitely felt rushed at points. In some respects, however, this feeling of urgency worked well with the content of the episode. For example, as Spector feels the walls starting to close in, he has to work fast and efficiently to both destroy any evidence connecting him to the crimes and to set up an escape route. That he neither cracks under the pressure nor confesses but rather walks away not only leaves open the possibility of a second season but also reflects his systematic and intelligent approach to things—precisely the qualities that make him a good killer. With this nuanced depiction of Spector’s personality in mind, I was disappointed that the show chose to give him the standard ‘broken home and family’ background and that it chose to personalize the relationship between him and Gibson. To some extent, the face-off between Gibson and Spector was inevitable, not only because they are the show’s two protagonists, but also because Spector is the ultimate expression of the patriarchal culture that Gibson has been struggling against throughout the series. The problem is that the final presentation of Spector as Gibson’s antagonist individualizes him (he becomes the Moriarty to Gibson’s Holmes, so to speak) and in doing so makes it more difficult to see him precisely as the expression of a system. Is this individualization an inbuilt limitation of the genre of television crime drama?

No comments:

Post a Comment