I also finished Brian Norman’s Dead Women Talking. In this closing section of the book, Norman
discusses Ana Castillo’s So Far From God,
Alice Sebold’s The Lovely Bones,
Suzan-Lori Parks’ Getting Mother’s Body,
and Maxine Hong Kingston’s “No Name Woman.” A couple of things really jumped
out at me, the first being the fact that Sebold’s novel is the first text to
which Norman does not give unqualified praise. Seeing it for the most part as a
rather insipid suburban novel that exemplifies that moment at which the
presence of a dead female narrator is in danger of becoming a gimmick, Norman nevertheless provides an astute reading of the way in which the novel’s
conclusion is surprising on both a plot-based and generic level. Norman’s book
ends very thought-provokingly with a discussion of a dead woman who refuses to
talk. After examining a number of examples of the ways in which dead women talking
force communities to come to terms with their histories and further the cause
of justice, Norman concludes that sometimes the most just and ethical position
is to let the dead remain silent.
Every day I read fifty pages of fiction, fifty pages of non-fiction, and I watch a movie. And then I tell you what I think of it all.
Thursday, January 30, 2014
HollowCity/DeadWomenTalking/Constantine
Today I read the first fifty pages of Ransom Riggs’ Hollow City (2014), the sequel to his 2011 novel Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children. I read Miss Peregrine at the urging of my older daughter, who loved it,
and I loved it, too. I found it refreshingly original and atmospheric and it
used the interface between text and image in really imaginative ways. Above
all, it conveyed a message about the importance of valuing difference that was
neither sentimental nor oversimplified. Hollow
City begins right after the cliffhanger ending of Miss Peregrine and the first fifty pages strike a nice balance
between advancing the action and recapitulating some of the key moments and
themes of the first novel.
I also watched Francis
Lawrence’s 2005 film Constantine, based on the comic Hellblazer. I’m not a huge fan of Keanu Reeves but I think he’s at his best here,
largely because he’s supported by an amazing cast including Tilda Swinton (as
the Archangel Gabriel!), Rachel Weisz (with a very credible American accent),
Peter Stormare (with a wonderfully creepy and restrained performance as
Lucifer), and one of my favorite character actors, Pruitt Taylor Vince (as an alcoholic
priest). Not even the awful Gavin Rossdale can mess things up. But despite
great acting and wonderful special effects, there’s one scene that ruins this
film for me. When a Mexican laborer accidentally finds the object the entire
film revolves around, he takes it to Los Angeles, crossing the border into the
US to do so. Thanks to the evil power of the object, the Mexican man leaves a
trail of death and destruction behind him, but the sight of this man jumping a
fence to enter the US and crossing a plain while cattle drop dead all around
him exemplifies viscerally racist fantasies of the immigrant as a source of
contagion in a completely uncritical fashion. Ironically, a deleted scene from the movie shows the Mexican man killing two border
patrol agents, but what Lawrence left in is just as egregious.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment