Every day I read fifty pages of fiction, fifty pages of non-fiction, and I watch a movie. And then I tell you what I think of it all.
Monday, September 1, 2014
Gary Shteyngart, Absurdistan
One of my favorite moments in Gary Shteyngart’s second novel, Absurdistan (2006), comes when he
makes fun of himself and his first novel, The
Russian Debutante’s Handbook: “Let me give you an idea of this Jerry
Shteynfarb. He had been a schoolmate of mine at Accidental College, a perfectly
Americanized Russian émigré (he came to the States as a seven-year-old) who
managed to use his dubious Russian credentials to rise through the ranks of the
Accidental creative writing department and to sleep with half the campus in the
process. After graduation, he made good on his threat to write a novel, a sad
little dirge about his immigrant life, which seems to me the luckiest kind of
life imaginable. I think it was called The
Russian Arriviste’s Hand Job or something of the sort. The Americans,
naturally, lapped it up.” The joke is funny partly because the two novels have
so much in common: a schlemiel as a protagonist; over-the-top humor;
larger-than-life characters, and an obsessive concern with the various meanings
of Jewishness in both multicultural America and a thoroughly globalized 21st
century. With all this said, there are significant differences between the two
novels, too. Whereas the subject of Shteyngart’s first novel was, to a large
extent, America, and its problematic and overdetermined embrace of the
immigrant, this novel’s protagonist, Misha Vainberg, is in a state of exile
from the United States, even though he yearns to return. Given this fact, the
type of fictional central Asian republic that formed only part of the setting
of Debutante’s is front and center in
this novel. Through the titular Absurdistan, Shteyngart conveys his complex
feelings about Russia, his country of origin, the experience of displacement
from both one’s home and adopted cultures, and the murky depths of realpolitik, a subject that is explored
with an uneasy combination of pathos and comedy. I say ‘uneasy,’ because initially
the move from comedy to violence, as the situation in Absurdistan worsens
rapidly, seems awkward and jarring. But this is where the concept of ‘absurdity’
does such important work for Shteyngart and it’s in this respect that I kept
thinking of Chester Himes as I was reading Absurdistan.
Although they’re very different writers, both use absurdity to achieve similar
ends: to combine comedy and violence in such a way that their readers can feel
what it means to be buffeted by history and randomness in a way that’s both
tragic and ridiculous at the same time. It’s this paradoxical combination of
emotions that Shteyngart makes his own.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment