Today I read the
next fifty pages of Jayne Anne Phillips’ Quiet
Dell. The novel is becoming less interesting the more it goes on. The
character of Powers is still firmly in the background and in the abstract one
would think that this decision to keep the killer out of the spotlight would be
one of the most interesting aspects of the novel. The problem, however, is that
Phillips has not been able to generate a character who holds the reader’s
attention as much as Powers himself might have been able to. The reporter,
Emily Thornhill, seems to be the novel’s protagonist, but Phillips doesn’t give
us enough of a reason to care about her perspective on the case. Annabel keeps
flitting in and out of the novel, but again, not enough is done with her to make
her compelling. An example of a road not taken comes when Phillips includes a
scene with Powers’ wife and her sister, emphasizing what kind of knowledge they
did or did not have of Powers’ activities. Telling the story from the
perspective of these characters could have been very interesting, but alas…
I also read the
next fifty pages of Georges Perec’s Species
of Spaces and Other Pieces. This includes pieces originally published in
the collection L’Infra-Ordinaire in
1989. In “Approaches to What?” Perec talks again about the power of the
ordinary, first by noting that it’s always the extraordinary and the
cataclysmic that grabs our attention, and then by asking how we should then
account for that which usually escapes our notice: “How should we take account
of, question, describe what happens every day and recurs every day: the banal,
the quotidian, the obvious, the common, the ordinary, the infra-ordinary, the
background noise, the habitual?” The other two pieces in this section of the
book can be read as answers to this question. “The Rue Vilin” consists of
Perec’s descriptive notes of a single street visited on a number of occasions
over a period of years, whereas “Two Hundred and Forty-three Postcards in Real
Color” (written for Italo Calvino) is made up of 243 banal postcards that list
a location, an activity, and a greeting. Reading all 243 is actually quite
difficult because they are so banal and repetitive but eventually one settles
into a rhythm of reading and then the minute variations in the ordinary start
to become both more apparent and more weighty. Incidentally, for those who know
Slavoj Žižek, I found Perec’s distinction between the extraordinary and the
ordinary reminiscent of Žižek’s distinction between visible and invisible
violence in his short book Violence: Six
Sideways Reflections. According to Žižek, it’s always the first that grabs
our attention, but we need to try and see the second type.
I also watched
the infamous 1936 propaganda film directed by Louis Gasnier, Reefer Madness. http://web.archive.org/web/20060328163318/http://www.reefer-madness-movie.com/history.html
Of course, I’d heard a lot about this film, but this is the first time I’d
actually watched it from start to finish. It certainly lives up to its
reputation in terms of its awful acting, its hysterical condemnation of
marijuana, and its laughable hysteria about the dangers of weed, and yet there
was something else about it that I didn’t anticipate. First, it was interesting
how drugs are not racialized in this movie by having any connection with
African Americans. Instead, both the pushers and the users in this movie are
middle-class white Americans. In this respect, Reefer Madness is unusually accurate in its depiction of who sells
and buy drugs in the US, much more so than most films on this subject. Second,
while Reefer Madness should indeed be
laughed at, we should not assume that we’ve moved on very far from this kind of
anti-drugs hysteria. Here’s a story I came across the other day: https://www.change.org/petitions/president-obama-commutation-for-weldon-angelos-55-years-for-marijuana?utm_source=action_alert&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=43498&alert_id=lTrGzXTBEr_ZFAISBQiCp.
A 55-year mandatory prison sentence for marijuana possession? Reefer madness is
alive and well in the 21st century US.
No comments:
Post a Comment