Thursday, December 19, 2013

O'Neill/Wee/ParanormalActivity3


Today I read the next fifty pages of Joseph O’Neill’s Netherland. At one point, O’Neill’s protagonist, Hans, describes himself as a “political and ethical idiot” and he’s not far wrong. Political opinions in the conventional sense, especially concerning America’s post-9/11 conduct, are instead given to Hans’ estranged English wife, Rachel, and it seems to me that O’Neill goes out of his way to make these opinions sound strident, clichéd, and even slightly hysterical. Hans’ almost total absence of political views is especially striking given his job as a financial analyst of the oil industry, a job with rich potential if this really were a post-9/11 novel, but with which O’Neill does practically nothing. In other words, it seems O’Neill is deliberately staying away from the truisms of a post-9/11 novel and doing something else instead. But what? One clue comes from the fact that Hans lives in the Chelsea Hotel, famous for its long history of bohemian residents. http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/2013/10/chelsea-hotel-oral-history O’Neill portrays the 21sy century version of the hotel in the same vein, with Hans joining an eclectic array of eccentric individuals all of whom are disaffiliated, in one way or another, from the American norm. This suggests that O’Neill’s larger theme is the need to belong or connect with others, a need that Hans feels acutely but is unable to satisfy due to a lack of imagination and a lack of energy. Perhaps Chuck Ramkissoon and cricket will fulfill that needs for Hans?

I also read the next fifty pages of Valerie Wee’s Japanese Horror Films and their American Remakes, in which Wee discusses Honogurai mizu no soko kara/Dark Water and Ju-On/The Grudge. A couple of notes about Wee’s method might be in order at this point. In each chapter, Wee elucidates the similarities and differences between the original and the remake and I think she has a tendency to understate the similarities and overstate the differences. For example, she’s quite right to say that the similarities between Honogurai and Dark Water can be ascribed to the pervasive influence of patriarchal thinking in both American and Japanese culture, an influence that determines the films’ treatment of divorced mothers raising their daughters, but to say this is not to say very much. It might be more productive to approach these similarities in generic and narratological terms; in other words, what are the constituent elements of horror films that tend to be present in both original and remake, and why are these elements considered to be indispensable? In terms of stressing differences, my argument with Wee is not that such differences don’t exist, because they do; rather, my argument is that these differences do not always have to be the focus of the critical narrative. I would also add that only certain types of difference seem to count for Wee and that if one were to consider these films’ intertextual relations more broadly, a different type of analysis would result. For example, how can one properly evaluate Sarah Michelle Gellar’s performance in The Grudge without mentioning Buffy?! http://www.foxnews.com/story/2004/10/24/buffy-star-faces-fear-in-horror-remake/

Perhaps inevitably, I also watched the next film in the Paranormal Activity series, the imaginatively titled Paranormal Activity 3. Although this entry in the series is subject to the law of diminishing returns that impacts all franchises, it still has its strong points. One of my favorite things about this series so far is the fact that it’s organized as a series of prequels, with 3 being set in 1988. This is an interesting choice partly for technological reasons, in that the technology of camera surveillance gets less sophisticated as the series progresses, a fact that dictates how each film is structured, and partly for narrative reasons. Because earlier parts of the story are filled in with each new movie, the audience also gets to revise its opinion of events and characters from the earlier movies. For example, what we find out about the childhoods of the sisters in this episode changes significantly our view of the sister’s situation in the first two films. To be precise, we understand that they have been pawns in someone else’s game for a very long time, so that our view of the decisions they make when they’re adults, decisions that we assume are a product of free will, we now understand were anything but. This is a great example of the narrative complexity that cam emerge from genre films when they are considered together as a series rather than as single films. Not coincidentally, 3 was the highest-grossing movie in the series so far. http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1673022/paranormal-activity-3-box-office-record.jhtml
Oh, and because I’ve mentioned horror parodies in previous posts, if you want to see one of the worst films ever made, check out this Paranormal Activity parody currently streaming on Netflix! http://movies.netflix.com/WiMovie/70291837?strkid=1531562959_0_0&trkid=222336&movieid=70291837

No comments:

Post a Comment