Alfred Hitchcock’s
fondness for Cornell Woolrich’s work, most famously evidenced by Rear Window, is well known, and Woolrich’s
The Black Curtain (1941) takes for
its subject one of Hitchcock’s favorite subjects: an innocent man plunged into
a frightening situation, wrongly accused of a crime, and struggling to prove
his innocence. Like Hitchcock, Woolrich finds this subject appealing because
the situation of the innocent man at the heart of such a scenario resembles so
closely (albeit in an intensified form) Woolrich’s view of the human condition
more generally: any sense of happiness one achieves is temporary and fragile at
best because it is always subject to being destroyed by the forces of random
chaos that can sweep away all security, certainty, and knowledge in a moment.
That moment comes for Woolrich’s protagonist, Frank Townsend, when he recovers
from a three-year bout of amnesia. On the surface, the beginning of the story
resembles a happy ending, in that he is restored to his old life, including an
adoring wife and his job, but when he starts being hunted by a threatening man
whom he does not recognize, Townsend must go back into the mysterious past to
find out who he was and what he did that is now threatening his life and
security. This being Woolrich, the happy ending is eventually secured, at least
in a formal fashion, but is unsatisfying to the reader for a couple of reasons.
First, the resolution of Townsend’s problems occurs rapidly at the end of the
novel in a manner that (I would argue) is deliberately unconvincing in the
sense that it does little to allay the reader’s discomfort. In other words, the
vast majority of the novel is dominated by Townsend’s incomprehension and fear,
and it is the suspense generated by these emotions that dominates the reader’s
reaction to the novel, not the happy resolution. Second, even if we take the
resolution at face value, the message of The
Black Curtain remains that one’s life can be destroyed in the blink of an
eye by a cruel and random chance act; imagine living life with that knowledge
at the front of your mind every day and you get some sense of the bleakness of
Woolrich’s view of the world.
Every day I read fifty pages of fiction, fifty pages of non-fiction, and I watch a movie. And then I tell you what I think of it all.
Tuesday, March 10, 2015
Monday, March 9, 2015
The Strange Color of Your Body's Tears (2013)
The Strange Color of Your Body's Tears is a 2013 neo-giallo written and directed by Hélène Cattet and Bruno Forzani.
It tells the story of a businessman (played by Klaus Tange) who returns home
from a business trip to find his wife is missing. As he tries to find her by speaking
to other residents of the strangely opulent apartment building in which they
live, he hears some of their stories, and gets dragged into an increasingly
hallucinatory series of events in which the border between reality and (erotic)
fantasy becomes more and more blurred. Like the classic giallo, Strange sticks to the most basic structure
of the mystery (there is a crime and then an investigation) and it is also
typical of the giallo in that the mystery is as much a question of perception
as it is an ontological fact. In other words, we can’t be absolutely sure that
a crime has even taken place, let alone whom the perpetrator might be. It
should be noted, however, that this is not at all a weakness in either this
film or in the genre as a whole; indeed, it is this mix of the gestural respect
paid to ratiocination along with the overwhelming presence of the surreal the
defines the giallo. In this regard, those who criticize Strange for having no discernible narrative structure are missing
the point entirely. With that said, the vast majority of Italian gialli do contain
some kind of resolution to the mystery—it may be outlandish and unconvincing (in
fact, all the better if it is!) but it’s usually there. Strange lacks even a weak resolution and no amount of visual style
(with which this film is packed) can quite compensate for this absence.
Sunday, March 8, 2015
Cornell Woolrich, 'The Bride Wore Black' (1940)
Cornell Woolrich’s
first crime novel, The Bride Wore Black,
was published in 1940, after Woolrich had already published several jazz-age
novels in the style of his literary model F. Scott Fitzgerald, and after he had
established a reputation as a prolific and talented writer of stories for pulp
magazines. Like so many other crime fiction writers who came to the genre after
writing other types of narratives, Woolrich found in crime fiction the perfect
means of expressing his bleak view of the world in a manner that is
simultaneously lyrical and chilling. Bride
is a revenge narrative, with the twist that the avenger is a young woman whose
husband was killed moments after they were married. She then devotes years of
her life to tracking down and killing the men she holds responsible for her
husband’s death, assuming a different identity each time, and always trading on
her ability to read the men’s weaknesses. As such, Bride is not only a powerful exploration of the extremes to which
melancholic revenge can push one, but also an utterly unsentimental and
insightful analysis of contemporary American masculinity. In this regard, the
fact that the plot hinges on an incredible coincidence and is filled with
various other examples of the unlikely does nothing to diminish its power. Not
only is Bride still effective as an
anatomization of male vanity and stupidity, but the role of random chance in
Woolrich’s fictional universe is the perfect objective correlative for the
animating principle of that universe: meaningless chaos.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)